Skip to content
Line illustration reading left to right: EEG traces from a brain feed into a processor holding a neural network, which produces a draft report, and a clinician signs the finished document.

Healthcare. AI Systems, Automation.

A hospital network clears a three-week EEG backlog.

70%
less drafting time
0
weeks of backlog, from three
70%
less drafting time
0
weeks of backlog, from three
Client
Hospital network (under NDA), Pakistan
Industry
Healthcare
What we built
AI Systems, Automation
Timeline
10 weeks, 2025

Before

An AI reporting pipeline that drafts EEG reports for neurologists to review and sign, cutting drafting time by 70%.

Neurologists were spending 45 to 90 minutes writing up every EEG. The queue grew faster than it could be cleared, and a three-week reporting backlog had built up behind it. Hiring more specialists was not an option at the speed the backlog was growing.

What we built

  1. 01

    The decision that shaped it

    We did not try to automate the diagnosis. The clinical judgement had to stay with the specialist, both for safety and for the hospital to accept the system at all. So we moved the automation one step earlier, to the blank page. If a neurologist opens a draft instead of an empty document, most of the time cost disappears without touching the decision itself.

  2. 02

    What we engineered

    A reporting pipeline that produces a draft report per study, structured the way the department already writes them. Clinicians review, correct and sign off, and the signed report is what leaves the system. Every draft is attributable and every edit is retained.

  3. 03

    Automated draft generation per study

    Clinician review and sign-off workflow. Department-specific report structure.

  4. 04

    What leaves the system

    Reporting moved from a bottleneck to a routine step. The existing backlog was cleared without adding specialist headcount, and the department kept full clinical control of what it signs.

EEG studiesDrafting pipelineConsultant reviewSigned report
  1. 01

    The decision that shaped it

    We did not try to automate the diagnosis. The clinical judgement had to stay with the specialist, both for safety and for the hospital to accept the system at all. So we moved the automation one step earlier, to the blank page. If a neurologist opens a draft instead of an empty document, most of the time cost disappears without touching the decision itself.

    EEG studiesDrafting pipelineConsultant reviewSigned report
  2. 02

    What we engineered

    A reporting pipeline that produces a draft report per study, structured the way the department already writes them. Clinicians review, correct and sign off, and the signed report is what leaves the system. Every draft is attributable and every edit is retained.

    EEG studiesDrafting pipelineConsultant reviewSigned report
  3. 03

    Automated draft generation per study

    Clinician review and sign-off workflow. Department-specific report structure.

    EEG studiesDrafting pipelineConsultant reviewSigned report
  4. 04

    What leaves the system

    Reporting moved from a bottleneck to a routine step. The existing backlog was cleared without adding specialist headcount, and the department kept full clinical control of what it signs.

    EEG studiesDrafting pipelineConsultant reviewSigned report
  • Automated draft generation per study
  • Clinician review and sign-off workflow
  • Department-specific report structure
  • Backlog clearance across the existing queue

What changed

EEG report drafting time cut by 70%, and a three-week backlog cleared.

Reporting moved from a bottleneck to a routine step. The existing backlog was cleared without adding specialist headcount, and the department kept full clinical control of what it signs.

A woman working at a laptop, with floating panels beside her showing a database linked to tables, a SQL query, a bar chart and a donut chart.
Next story, Retail analyticsA 2.5-million-row warehouse learns to answer in plain English.

Have a process shaped like this one?

Describe it in plain language. We will respond with a proposed architecture, a first milestone and the key risks.

We respond within one business day. If we are not the right fit, we will tell you.